Curious Case of Chetan Bhagat.

                                                                                                                           
Chetan Bhagat wrote his first piece of crap called five point someone which is based on three IIT students. 

It is quite interesting and demands a sociological study that these days IITs may not be producing best minds but brotherhood among IITians is as strong as Binani cement. Any initiative by an alumni gets huge support from the students of IITs and from those who aspire to join it. This is how Chetan Bhagat became a known writer as every aspirant wanted to get a feel of IIT life before becoming part of it. And mind you, many such students waste their parents' hard earned money in coaching institutes situated in desert towns for their IIT dream. 

IITs do need to contemplate what has gone wrong that Kejriwal and Bhagat are becoming the face of its alumnus. Kejriwal used the IIT support base as a launch pad till Kejriwal had not started to receive midnight hawala funds. In Bhagat's case, they bought and popularized his first attempt at being an English language writer. He may claim of high sales figure, but in India, Sunny leone is the most searched person on google.

I have observed so many times in Indian rail journeys when boys who are traveling alone to go back to their home in UP and Bihar, they pull a chetan Bhagat book out of their bag which they buy from wheeler book shops at railway platforms to impress the girls sitting in the compartment. Bhagat is praiseworthy for offering an English option for readers of 'Saras Saleel'.

In his first Novel, Chetan wrote a note of thanks to his best friend. None other than 'Microsoft word with its grammar check option'. He was honest enough to accept that without Grammar check option, he won't be confident enough to publish his first pulp fiction. 

To write a Chetan bhagat-esque book, You do not need great ideas, you need some spice, some salt and some oil and voila, Your bhagat baingan bharta shall be ready to eat- sorry read. In his recent article, he has used all the expletives to make caricature of a 'bhakt' which implies Modi supporters on social media. Now i am really confused. Till date, his opponents would ridicule Modi for his NRI support base on social media which does not vote and does not represent the mood of the nation. 

The NRIs are not pulling rickshaws in United states of America or other countries of the world. Many American surveys regularly inform us that Hindu immigrants are the richest ethnic group over there and many of them may be earning more money that Chetan Bhagat by the virtue of their intellect and communications skills. Now Bhagat is saying that 'bhakts' are half educated like his protagonist of 'half girlfriend' or mediocre like his another protagonist of his call centre book. Modi supporters seem like that elephant which many blind people are defining in their own way.

Is is possible that Chetan is figuring out his own reader base. How extraordinary to pay back your devoted readers who made you rich by buying your 200 pages book for few pages of erotica. There could be one strong reason behind this. Chetan wants to shrug off such base and move to more suave readers. Those whom he meets regularly in literature fests and book fairs. Has he completed his grammar classes and does not need 'grammar correct' option of Microsoft word anymore. he is rich, now he wants to earn 'class'. He does not want to be intimidated by Salman Rushdie any more. Hey Chetan stop googling 'how to get booker prize', you won't get it ever.

But Chetan, one suggestion for you. A good writer is famous not because he is good at English grammar. He has got his poetic license to create new words and play with them. even his grammatical mistakes become part of the narrative. He becomes famous because of his imaginations which make the readers to become part of the story. You can only titillate your readers by giving description of how your protagonists screwed his professor's daughter or his friend's sister. Try writing one book without your patent formula of bed scene. It reminds me of those C grade movies of Mithun Chakraborty which would attract crowd for having few bathroom and few bed scenes. That crowd and your reader base may have a lot of common faces i am sure.

So, please continue with your pulp fiction and don't abuse your own reader base. I have another doubt. Are you defining yourself as many of those expletives suit you perfectly. Sexually frustrated to imagine such cheap stories or bad English grammar for which Microsoft word helped you so much or for being Modi supporter to be part of the gravy train. many of your class is attacking Modi for one particular reason. He refused any favors. Are you one of them who could not bag a Padmashree? or is it because Bhagat and Bhakt are similar words that you had to write another idiotic article to remain in news.

Note: i am sure you or your fans will try hard to judge my English but hey it is my fourth language after Bajjika, Hindi and French. And I am not frustrated because of my English Mr. Bhagat.

Review of haider from a Hindu perspective.

।।ह़ैदर एक हिन्दु की नजर से।।

कभी कभी एक औसत कहानी जिसे एक पल का महत्व मिलना भी मुश्किल होता है, एक वैसी कहानी दस्तक देती है हमारे अन्तरात्मा के दरवाज़े पर, जिस दरवाज़े के पीछे हम अपने दर्द को कहिं दफ़न कर चुके होते हैं. हम भुल चुके होते हैं उस सौगंध को जो हमने खायी थी जब हम हार गये थे, जब हम भाग रहे थे अपने पुर्वजों के हाथों बनाये धर को छोड़ कर. एक औसत कहानी उस धाव को कुरेदती है, छटपटाहट होती है इस बात पर कि आज भी वो सौगंध अधूरा है. जब हमने तसल्ली दी थी अपने आप को कि हम लौटेंगे. हम जीतेंगे उस ज़मीन को जहां हमारा धर खंडहर में तबदील हो गया है.

ह़ैदर उसी कहानी का नाम है. एक कहानी जो हमें याद दिलाती है अनंतनाग की, ये कहानी बताती है कि कैसे अब वो इस्लामाबाद बन गया है. कैसे कश्यप की धरती कश्मीर में अब शैव पंथ के हर अवशेष को शरिया कानून के मुताबिक चादर में लिपटी छोटी छोटी बच्चीयों ने भुला दिया है.

ह़ैदर एक ऐसी कहानी है जहां नायक की भूमिका में वो वर्ग है जिसने मस्जिद के छत से मुवज्जिन का इस्तेमाल हमारे सामने कुछ  शर्त रखने के लिये किया था. आज भी वो शर्त गूंजते है कानों मे और कचोटते हैं मन को कि कैसे मौत और पलायन में से चुन लिया था हमनें एक आसान रास्ता. कुर्दिस्तान की महिलावों के क्लास्निकोव लिये तस्वीरें हंसती हैं हम पर कि क्या हम भी उन दो शर्तों के सामने अपनी आवाज़ नहीं उठा सकते थे, क्या हमारे उढे हुये आवाज के बाद भी ह़ैदर हिम्मत करता हमारे अस्तित्व को नकारने की.

ह़ैदर एक ऐसी कहानी है जहां कहानीकार चुत्पाह का उदाहरण हीं तो देता है जब हमें कश्मीर से बाहर धकेलने वालों के साथ खड़ा डॉक्टर बड़ी बेशर्मी से जवाब देता है कि वो जिंदगी के साथ खड़ा है. इस औसत कहानी में किरदारो ने अदला बदली कर ली है, एक बेटी का बाप पुलिसवाला तो है लेकिन वह विलेन का सहायक है, एक ऐसा विरोधाभाष जहां कर्तव्य के लिये मौत को गले लगाना ऐसा लगता है जैसे वो गद्दार हो.

ह़ैदर कहानी का खलनायक इसलिये बुरा है क्युंकि वो कौम का गद्दार है, उस कौम का जिसे अनंतनाग जैसा नाम अटपटा लगता है, वही खलनायक अपने जीवन की परवाह नहीं करता और दौड़ पड़ता है अपनी प्रेमिका को बचाने के लिये. उसके चिथड़े उड़ जाते हैं पर नायक अभी भी अपने 'जिंदगी के साथ' खड़े पिता के अंतिम ख्वाहिश को पूरा करने के लिये बंदूक उठा लेता है. नायक का सहयोगी रुह़कार नायक की मां को मानवबम बना कर जान ले लेता है फिर भी उसका ओहदा कहीं उंचा है. ऐसे विरोधाभाष से भरी ये औसत कहानी चुभती है. इसलिये नही क्युंकि कहानी हमारे पलायन और हार को तोड़-मड़ोड़ के दिखाती है, परन्तु इसलिये कि ये हमारे पलायन को दिखाती ही नहीं है. और जब ये पहलू गायब हो जाये तो पाकिस्तान के पैसे से चलने वाला आतंकवाद आजादी की लड़ाई लगने लगता है.

ह़ैदर कहानी में जहां हमारे हिन्दु अस्तित्व को कश्मीर के विचारधारा से मिटा दिया जाता है वहीं एक गाने में प्रकट होता है मार्तंड सूर्य मंदिर एक अलग किरदार में. एक मंदिर जो पंद्रह सौ साल तक सूर्य के उपासकों का तीर्थस्थल रहा, और सुल्तान बुत्शिखान को साल भर लग गये नष्ट करने में, इस कहानी में यह घर है एक विशालकाय दैत्य का जो नायक को यतीम कर देता है.

ये कहानी एक चेतावनी है उन हिंदुओं के लिये जिन्हे भागना पड़ा अपने पुर्वजों के भुमि से, कि अब समय आ गया है उस सौगंध को पूरा करने का जो हमनें खायी थी, समय आ गया है उस कश्मीर भूमि पर फिर से सूर्य ध्वज लहड़ाने का. और अगर हम इस बार भी हार गये तो कोई आश्चर्य नही होगा अगर विशाल भारद्वाज के अगले फिल्म की कहानी में श्रीनगर का नया नाम हैदराबाद हो.

फिल्म के द्रुश्य सुंदर है, कश्मीर को ऐसे ही स्वर्ग नही कहा जाता. शाहिद कपूर सूर्य मंदिर के प्रांगण में और नुक्कड़ नाटक करते हुये दमदार अभिनय करते हैं और इसकी बदौलत एक औसत कहानी दर्शकों को जगा के रख सकती है लेकिन अंत तक कुछ अच्छा देखने के इन्तजार के बाद दर्शक हाथ मलता हुआ सिनेमाहॉल से बाहर आ जाता है.

Sent from

Half cooked Hindutva of BJP.

In the last days of NDA government, Atal ji was quite convinced that he did enough for development of India and being a true Nationalist, he felt that Muslims should also be brought on board. He actually increased the annual budget and number of seats for Haj. A Bhaichara committee was made and Muslim intellectuals were given task to convince the Muslim voters. The situation seemed so favorable that few Muslim leaders like Nazma Heptullah joined BJP considering it as greener pasture. But the results proved that for Muslims, fear psychosis of Hindutva was more of an issue than development done by BJP.

Now let’s come to 2014. Narendra Modi worked for development of Gujarat for 11 years and now time has arrived to convince Muslims about his secular credentials. Many Muslims are joining BJP. JUH chief is praising Modi, whenever a Muslim writes one phrase in praise of Modi, he gets a big round of applause. All this reminds me of 2004. And I am afraid if this race to be 'secular than thou' back fires.

Modi may not have participated in 2002 riots, there are no proofs but 2003 elections of Gujarat were not won on the agenda of Development but Hindu ashmita. Modi became poster boy of Hindutva by talking about Hindus and many obvious but politically incorrect statements came. ‘Hum 5 hamare 25' this was not used by him for aliens but for muslims. His election speeches used to make the crowd go mad for him and he had a clean sweep in the election. The Hindutva poster boy who was being seen as a strong leader who could save the hindus from repeated attacks. Gujarat is a place where muslims used to start rioting even if temple bells disturbed their evening Namaz. 

More the riots happened more the hindus' wish for a strong Hindu leader got stronger. Even if Modi did his job as CM of Gujarat, he was seen as a leader who let the hindus take revenge for the Godhra train burning and many more events of the past. This image of Modi gave him a strong mandate and a state where more than 5 lakh people participated in the riots, He became the supreme leader. Now if we choose a path, it always has it,'s benefits and it's drawbacks as well. If the Hindutva poster boy image can be used to win an election authoritatively then Modi has to carry the baggage of the perception that was created for him.

Riots are not something that happened only in Gujarat or it happened for the first time but one thing is sure that Gujarat made it clear that arson done by muslims won't be pardoned any more.

Muslims of Gujarat understood that cohabitation is the only choice and violence is not the solution as it won't intimidate other people anymore.

Till now everything was ok, Narendra Modi was facing the secular brigade with singular agenda to demonize him. The more he was demonized, more he got fans. This led to a very dangerous change in the life of Hindu poster boy. In place of talking for those Hindus in distress in Kerala; assam, bengal, hyderabad and many such places, he started to be given a makeover to be the PM of India. To be a PM of India, the rule of the political game says that he must be secular and have universal(Read America) acceptance. Definitely he is a a great orator, he is one of the best administrators to rule an Indian state. But first of all his path that he chose, was of a Hindu poster boy. 

If this craving for secular tag won't come, he would have led the Hindutva movement and development of the country on parallel tracks. BJP came to 80 seats from 2 seats not on the issue of development alone but Hindutva. The fire in every hindu's heart is burning to break the shackles of 1000's of years of suppression and slavery and BJP used this fire to reignite it's political mashal. It is a fact that any Prime minister of India should be accepted in all sections of society and this is why Vajpayee who wasn't present at the manch of KAR SEVA in Ayodhya to shout slogans 'ek dhakka aur do, Babri Masjid tod do', became the prime minister of India. Every organization needs different sets of people. Politics is the only domain where dove is projected to the masses and hawk remains in the back seat to control the show. Advani could bring BJP to such heights but could not bring himself close to electoral victory. The reason is simple, He chose the path of Hawk, the day he mounted on the Rathyatra for Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. 

Midterm course correction only shows lack of commitment and courage in a leader. Once the path is chosen, he should continue to be firm on it. Hope Narendra Modi will understand that when his propaganda machinery churns out news like muslim corporators coming to BJP it doesn't make any difference. We know that Modi is a great administrator but as he said minimum governance is the key, the people are industrious enough to develop our nation. Most of the leaders can't be near to Modi if we talk about administration but don't let this hamper the larger goal. 

Many people are confused that Hindutva will bring fanaticism but they don't know that Hindutva is needed to wake up the lion sleeping in every hindu so that he can stand up to any sort of injustice happening in the society. 

Hindutva is not political Hinduism, it is a way to wake the soldier in every Hindu so that he can fight for the down trodden against the Caste system that divides India anymore and no woman is forced for female foeticide. We need leaders who can stand up to lead the march towards the goal of Hindutva. There is news that Modi would contest from Lucknow. What will his campaign speeches consist of? I have heard his speeches several times but development is good to be done, boring to hear again and again. Boasting about Gujarat capacity to produce milk or electricity cannot be used in every speech. 

Modi should continue his path of Hindutva poster boy and continue the baton from where advani left. The unfinished task of building the Ram mandir at ayodhya should be the election manifesto and let the Hindus of India vote of a development model with hindutva as its base. It will affect UP, Uttarakhand, Bihar, Madhya pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Punjab and many more states in favor of BJP. The dream of a BJP run government will come true. India is a secular nation but it doesn't mean that hindus should suffer to retain secularism. Ram Mandir is not a religious issue but it is a symbol of revival. 500 years back, a Mughal emperor destroyed a hindu temple in the most revered site for Hindus to show the might of islam (quwat-ul-islam) and it will be written in the history books that this might of an invader was crushed after 500 years. This is how history should be told. We were enslaved but after several centuries we turned the tide.

Pseudo Secular (read opportunist) media has created a perception that Hindutva can't bring BJP into power. . Only ideology based development can be good for nation or we will end up having people craving for money and money only.

We don't need to follow the western model of development. It is not obligatory. We can always follow our own model in which every village is a self dependent unit. Prosperity is not judged by refrigerator in house, but the social values in our society.

Let’s make this dream come true.


Follow Navneet on Twitter

What should be done to stop Hindutva!

This structure was not empty in past.

Many 'secular' friends believe that Hindutva is fascist face of Hinduism. To a very small extent they have got reasons to say so. The most important reason is a recent perception about Hinduism that it is non violent to its core and to boast of this great virtue, people claim that India has never invaded any country in thousands of years and status quo should be maintained. Indians got independence through non violence of Gandhi so it is a very potent weapon to fight the enemy with!

Now the question is if Hindutva is fascist and promotes violence and blood bath in the society the secular class must find the reason why it is growing in the society and what should be done to challenge it.

broken statue in Bangladesh

Hindus have realized that their non violence has not been strong enough to protect them, and they need to be ready to fight if there are attacks and not to run away to save life. To fight doesn't only mean to 'shed blood' but to fight on any platform to not let anybody do injustice. So, even if you are an atheist, protect the temple of your community or your identity will be the next to be attacked. There was no need of Hindutva if our secular class and leadership had not abandoned 'Non violent' Hindu mass. There are many incidents that have forced Hindus to rethink about their policy of non violence.We should not cry over the criminal incidents of medieval ages and we can't punish someone for those crimes.  But what is expected from secular class is to acknowledge those crimes and learn from history so that such crimes are not repeated. whereas the secular class not only denied those crimes but tried to erase any available evidence. 

Arab invaders did whatever possible to break the morale of the Hindus and the modus operandi was always to destroy a temple and construct a mosque on top of it. Now what the secular class and its 'eminent historians' did? They denied such incidents and in case the evidence was glaring at them, they created ridiculous stories to justify destruction.

The point is that an invader built something not as a place of worship but to prove his might (Quwat-ul-islam). It is true Hindus couldn't save the temples at that time. But when India got independence, secular class could have convinced the Muslims of India not to choose wrong icons as their identity. These historical errors could be corrected and the temples could be reconstructed. Ayodhya, Kashi and Mathura are three locations specially known for three Hindu Gods, Ram, Shiva and Krishna, and all these three cities remind you of the Hindu oppression perpetrated by invaders who were also followers of Islam. 

SOMNATH TEMPLE BEFORE RECONSTRUCTION

Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel was pragmatic and first thing that he did was to reconstruct Somnath temple which had a long history of being destroyed several times. India could easily correct the mistakes in Ayodhya, kashi and mathura too but presence of a mosque structure at these sites made them jittery and they backed off. this is how they  presented the symbol of Hindu oppression as holy sites for Muslims  The sites which will always remind Hindus of their slavery.

Today if someone desecrates st. Paul church at Shimla and builds a temple, I would prefer destruction of such temple and reconstruction of the church. I don't want to be seen as a oppressor and won't allow my religion to be used for such purpose. The real amity among two big communities of India could only be possible by correcting the historical mistakes. This is why Nations like Germany acknowledge the Jewish suppression done by Hitler and highlight it so that the wounds can be soothed. 

But Indian secularism failed just because it has a huge populace of opportunist people who used secularism just for profiteering and vote bank politics and never cared about Hindu-Muslim unity or a stable society with all round development. They kept these wounds alive and confused the Muslims to choose wrong representatives. This is the reason great scientists like APJ Abdul Kalam will not be a Muslim icon but Babri Masjid can touch emotions of everybody in Muslim community.

This is failure of secular class as they failed to acknowledge the problem and never tried to solve it. Hindus would have opened their coffers to construct world's largest mosque as compensation, but they merit to have their three most important holy sites to be free of such symbols of suppression.

What if an army invades mecca and destroys Kaaba and constructs some holy structure! The best solution would be to destroy that holy structure and reconstruct the Kaaba .when and in how many centuries?, does not matter. Religion and History evolve in centuries. Mughals ruled major parts of India for almost 300 years and then British replaced them. To write these two chapters of Indian history, it took more than 450 years. If some one claims that crime of 16th century does not merit a correction then you definitely lack the vision to observe history unfolding in front of you.

Advani Rath yatra for Ram Temple.

Secular class introduced politics of appeasement, vote bank and favoritism and these all aspects only led to Hindus feeling more alienated and this gave potion to Hindutva so that it could thrive in our society. If our secular leaders would not have changed the definition of secularism, would have convinced our Muslim brethren not to choose symbols of Hindu oppression as their symbol of Pride, it would have brought peace forever. To make it clear that the motive behind this correction was not bigotry, we could have built world’s largest mosque but the encroachment from the three holy sites of Hindus must be removed as they are symbols of slavery. 

old photo with statue of king George

You have seen the first picture in this post. Now check the same place with statue of King George. Why was it removed? You know the answer.

Muslims don't need to be ashamed of those crimes as they were actually the victims, the people who were forcefully converted with might of sword. They have definitely faced more oppression in the hands of those Arab invaders but the irony is that our secular class, in place of teaching the right history glorified those invaders and Tipu sultan became a savior, Aurangzeb became a kind emperor and Akbar became Akbar The great. 

Muslims of modern India were not even given enough opportunities to grow and not allow the symbols of medieval injustice become their icon but to create new symbols that represented them. Muslims of modern India were simply forced by the secular class to behave like vote banks. How would they loot if every citizen of India started to vote for development, good education, proper life and a bright future for our children? The day Muslims will realize this bluff, India will change for better. Amen.

Follow me on Twitter

Hindutva :Militarization of Hindus

The word 'Hindutva' could be one of the most abused and misinterpreted term in India. Some people find it mirror image of an Islamist Sharia state, some believe it as a narrow interpretation of Hinduism by Hindu extremist class, some believe it as a dangerous cult which is ready to riot and divide India, some believe that Hindus want to have political power through Hindutva, as they think that it can unite Hindus to vote on issues closer to Hindu religion and some believe it as a reactionary force which rejects the appeasement policies of secular class and came into existence due to failure of secular forces.

All above interpretations have merit to a small extent but Hindutva can't be fixed in their frame and has its own space.

Similarly Indian Secular elite have given new dimensions to the word 'secularism'. Secularism has become a shield which can be used to defend the indefensible. It is some sort of Master key that opens doors to anywhere. A conman can parrot the secular mantra 100 times a day and his misdeeds will be not only ignored but he will be presented as a victim. 

journalist cum lobbyist Barkha replies to Nilim

Take recent example of Nilim Datta who is in prison for cheating people. The man could deny gravity with his moronic logics and such strong was his secular shield that several central ministers love to be in his company. Shashi Tharoor who could be UN chief from India, follows Nilim datta on twitter, thank God We were saved of this horror of seeing Tharoor as UN chief otherwise to show himself as 'secular' he could even deny death of our soldiers and would be suggesting for liberation of his In Laws' home. Secularism is the panacea for any ailment and this is the reason mediocre love to boast of secularism that is another thing that they won't be able to defend Indian secularism at all and will always cry foul to divert the question.

Now when mediocre class abuses you for taking a path then be sure that you are going in right direction and this is the case with Hindutva.

Shashi tharoor following a conman on twitter

I have heard many definitions of Hindutva professed by Organizations like RSS and others and no fix explanation can be given.

Majority of the people believe that Hindutva is political face of Hinduism. This is the most common misconception about RSS or any other parallel group promoting Hindutva.

For what I understand, Hindutva deals with only one dimension of Hinduism and that is to work for Militarization of Hindus. It doesn't mean that people are being armed and being given military training but making them ready to fight back in case of threat. This view can be applied to any persecuted community be it, shias, Ahmadis, Hindus of Pakistan and Bangladesh or the Copts of Egypt or Jews of the world..

Now the question is why militarization is needed? To know the answer, we should go back in the history.

Hindus who used to have an armed vigilant society lost the courage to fight back due to continuous suppression for almost 800 years and compromise became a part of life. It’s a religion which has no God without a weapon in Hand. A religion which has hundreds of scriptures including Ramayana and Mahabharata which glorifies death occurred in battle field. Bhagvad Geeta was dictated by Lord Krishna in the battle field of Kurukshetra to motivate Arjuna so that he could kill his own cousins for his right to rule.  A religion with such roots got alienated from the very idea of Hinduism and forgot that ultimate peace can only be attained by having an armed society which can fight back if need be. The extreme of this alienation could be seen in the rise of Mahatma Gandhi. Hindus who used to worship Durga to seek power, Hindus who used to do Shastra pooja when weapons are worshiped, they agreed with Gandhi and his non violent principles which included the two cheek theory. 

A Land with Hindu majority was ruled by Muslim invaders for more than 800 years and the Hindu warrior class whose duty was to fight back, chose to compromise and gave their daughters to Arab invaders in marriages. Harems of Mughal emperors contained more than 5000 women who were picked to satisfy the sexual urge of Mughals. You can imagine a society where a king treats women as prostitutes and these women could not find a savior but to dismay of the citizens, other Hindu kings followed similar path and started to keep harems. 

Hindutva works to change this suicidal mindset and works for revival of the military culture of Hindus so that when they are threatened, they don't run away to save life but fight back. Until and unless ‘power to retaliate’ is not revived the massacres of Hindus will continue in Bangladesh, Pakistan and many parts of India. Hindus will be treated as a helpless mass which can be beaten, burnt and raped without any fear of repercussion. Hindutva deals only with this aspect of Hinduism. Politics is far away from Hindutva. Political power was never a goal of Hindutva but only one of the tools to get closer to the target of militarization of Hindus. BJP is not the trunk of the RSS tree but one of the hundreds of stems. In fact RSS doesn't get muddled in politics and gives its cadres and supporters free will to choose their political leaders. For example this can be seen in Orissa where RSS works in every single tribal village and still BJD Has absolute majority. 

Hindutva is one of the most abused terms by different sections due to different reasons. The secular class has sole reason that is its mediocrity and opportunism. Chanting secular mantras let them grab opportunities without merit and cover their mediocre traits. Muslims abuse it due to 2 reasons.  As It denies them their superiority complex and denies their claim of being ancestors of the Muslim invaders who ruled India for 800 years.

Massacres of vast scale have happened in India in almost every period. Be it Feroz Shah tuglaq, be it Shahjahan, be it Aurangzeb or be it Mohammed Ali Jinnah, they have all used massacres to assert their right to rule. In India, its Hindu majority has been killed even for reasons like ringing temple bells at the time of Namaz or if they tried to protect their women f or they denied paying zajia tax. Yes you might be surprised but Hindus have paid zazia tax to buy peace in their own land. This continuous persecution made Hindus so weak at heart that major massacres of Noakhali could happen; Jinnah could openly challenge India of direct action day and open use of terror to get what he wanted. The elite class Muslims due to their superiority complex, even though lesser in number could never accept to be ruled by a Hindu. This is the reason why Jinnah called for direct action day and thousands of Hindus died and nobody could return back the favor to Jinnah and his Islamic murderers. These chapters of history which were suppressed by the secular class of for the sake of power could not be erased in entirety. There is a very important question which we can ask; why Gujarat riots are so much painful for the Muslim leadership where as 100's of riots has occurred in India. 

Why don't they cry for Noakhali or riots that have occurred in Gujarat earlier? The reason is very simple. Earlier riots where led by Muslims and Hindus were on defensive side. This is the mindset that gave enough confidence to Muslim mob of Godhra to dare to burn a whole compartment full of 59 Hindu pilgrims. They had no fear of repercussion; they had taken Hindus for granted. They could not imagine that Hindus will return the favor. Riots started after that, and Ruler of Gujarat had enough grace to let the families get the charred bodies and do the last rites which won't have happened in a secular government. They would have dumped the bodies in some pit and covered the whole story as some alien attack. This is the reason Gujarat riot is so painful for Indian Islamists. They got the message that Hindus won't remain silent anymore and every attack of violence will have its repercussions. This balance of terror is the reason, Gujarat had 11 years of pin drop silence on the riot meter and no local Muslim has tried to blast a bomb. The feeling of superiority complex has evaporated and Muslims have learned the art of cohabitation.  

In modern civics lessons, Gujarat riots will be seen as a crime against Humanity but when history will be written after 500 years, Gujarat riots will be shown as a turning point from where Hindus learnt to retaliate, no doubt the retaliation had several incidents of rapes and killing of children and women which tarnished Hindutva but don't forget that many criminals and congressis profited from the situation and participated in the riots to loot. 

Babri Masjid demolition won't be shown as a criminal act but it will be a historical turning point for how Hindus could capture back their lost land by reconstructing the Ram Temple after almost 600 years. This is result of Militarization of Hindus. If you believe it should be stopped, Go ask a Kashmiri Pandit or an Egyptian Copt, how secularism has helped them and how the lack of courage to fight back has left them as refugees in their own country. Once that ice of inferiority is broken, India will be respected. 

As Ramdhari Singh DInkar has written, 

"Kshama shobhti us bhujang ko 

jiske pass garal ho

Usko kya jo dant-heen, vishrahit 

vineet saral ho"

You have right to pardon someone only when you have courage and strength to punish someone. A snake which has no poison is smashed by stones.

Follow me on Twitter